Regular City Council Meeting April 7, 2009
City Council Chambers 7:00 p.m.
Present: Mayor –
Council members
Jeff Whiting
City Administrator
City Clerk Connie L. Dalrymple
City Attorney
Press: Gothenburg Times - Beth Barrett
Also present: Mr. & Mrs. Scott Bahe,
Mayor Hudson opened the meeting and public hearing at 7:00 p.m. Advance notice and a copy of the agenda were given to the Council and members of the press. City Council meetings are conducted in accordance with the Open Meetings Act, a copy of which is available for public inspection on the north wall of the Council Chambers.
The hearing on ducks
and geese at
Written and verbal comments included:
- A few ducks are ok. If we quit feeding them, they will leave and find their own food.
- Many local and out of state people come to see the gees. It’s an opportunity to view a migration in our town. Kids are thrilled although we shouldn’t feed them. Let nature deal with them.
- The migration has shifted and the geese are here to stay. They are fascinating to watch. If those remaining are fed by the river lakes, they will move.
- It used to be a pleasure to walk the lake area, it’s no longer enjoyable.
- The dilemma is whether we want a wetland or recreation area. The lake area was built to be a park and it’s difficult to enjoy it with so many fowl and the resulting excrement.
- The lake was a former source of pride in the community. We used to canoe and play in the grass. We helped plant trees and the walking trail is a great asset now reduced to sewage. I’m not against wildlife but if we want the area to be wildlife, we need to cease human activity – no snow removal, mowing, picnicking, or tree planting. If we want our park back we need to drain the lake for two years to interrupt the migration, deepen the lake, then provide for water coming in and going out of the lake.
- There should be room for ducks, geese, and people. It’s a rare privilege to see for a few months of the year. Let them be.
- Seventeen years ago ducks and geese were introduced to the lake. People fed them and soon there was too many. They feel safe there. I took a walk at the lake and was afraid to let my dog get in the water. I’m an avid sportsman but no one should let their dogs in the water now. What is the liability to the City if someone gets into the water? I miss the lake of 20 years ago.
- I live west of the lake; the geese are music to my ears. The problem is the domestics and the only way is to get rid of them. Stores sell them and when they get too big, people take them to the lake. The problem is that we have a dead lake, it needs fresh water. Even if you drain the lake, they’ll be back in the fall. They won’t leave; it’s a refuge from hunters. The flocks will migrate but will be back.
- The ducks and geese are attractive, but they are unsanitary because of the dead water. Maybe more aeration may help. It’s a goose lake now, no fish live there. Domestics are livestock, stop feeding them. Leave the wild ones alone and let nature take care of them.
- The City owns the lake and buys water from NPPD. We also pump water into the lake. We have to buy water because we do not have water rights. The water has been tested and was not found to be unhealthy although it is unsightly. An aerator was installed a few years ago to put air into the water.
-
When I moved here in 1981
- At one time there was good fishing. Now it’s a dead lake. Instead of pumping out could there be an outlet on the northwest side by the canal?
- According to research, in a safe water habitat the numbers will increase significantly over a short period of time and the birds will become quite large because they are sedentary. Each bird will then produce over one pound of excrement daily. No amount of water ‘turnover’ will help.
- The geese make a mess of a park that could be a really nice attraction to town. Right now it’s a borderline eyesore, and very non-functional for almost any family use (no offense to the park crew, they do a good job). Geese do not need the lake, they are animals that spend their life adapting to changes in their environment. They will still live and thrive around other open waters sources. I’d like to see the lake dredged / cleaned up and stocked with fish so kids can ride their bikes to the lake and catch fish.
Park caretaker Tim Lauer asked Council to decide if they want a park or wildlife refuge. The numbers of birds at the lake are like sheep – they eat the grass to the ground. The soil is not good anyway and it’s nearly impossible to grow and maintain grass.
The consensus of all
comments received was that the community enjoys the ducks and geese at
After comments were received Council discussed the issue of water flow into and out of the lake, reclaiming the area as a park, and budgeting the necessary funds.
Kennedy moved,
Mayor Hudson suggested, and Council agreed, that she and Administrator Clymer come up with a committee to create a plan of action to reclaim the lake area as a park.
Kennedy moved, Whiting seconded, to approve the consent agenda that included:
City Council minutes - March 17
Police Report – March
Cemetery Sexton report – Jan - March
Roll call vote: Yea -
Strauser moved, Kennedy
seconded, allowing payment of the claims against the City, $152,224.04, except
#1323; Public Works Division $111,631.26; the March 19 payroll of $31,135.71
and April 2 payroll of 29,658.51. Roll
call vote: Yea – Kennedy, Whiting, Strauser,
Kennedy moved,
Whiting seconded, allowing payment of claim #1323 to
Open Forum:
-
The worn out chair along the street at 11th
and Ave G should be removed and the light on the flag pole at
- We have received Notice of Release of Funds on the owner occupied housing project. Representatives of West Central NE Development District will be in the office next week to explain guidelines and the application process.
- We’ve received notice of $250,000 funding for implementation of the downtown revitalization project. It will take approximately 6 – 8 weeks to receive release of funds and then project applications can begin.
Whiting moved,
Kennedy seconded, to pass and approve Ordinance #843 regarding water and sewer
rates, on third and final reading. Roll
call vote: Yea –
Item 6© Proposed ordinance incorporating zoning changes – CNSC request and general updates was removed from the agenda and not discussed.
We currently have separate Municipal Code book and Zoning and Subdivision Regulations book. American Legal Publishing will recodify both into one unit document, including all updates, and post it on our website. The base contract is $6500 with additional fees for each page, probably $8000 - $10,000 to finish the project. This will also correct errors between codes and duplications in the codes. The finished document will need to be reviewed carefully before being adopted.
Item 6(f) Proposed
ordinance to convey property to Redevelopment authority (abandoned property at
Kennedy moved,
Strauser seconded, to pass and approve Resolution 2009-7 authorizing signature
of documents relative to State Revolving Loan Funds for the sanitary sewer
project. Roll call vote: Yea – Whiting,
Regi
Fruit expressed concern for the safety of children using the playground
equipment on the north side of
Discussion was had. It’s difficult to eliminate all parking
because the homes on the north side of the street do not have adequate parking
as it is. Eliminating parking on the
south side would remove the handicap space near the equipment and
restrooms. It was decided to have City
Services Director
Robert Meyer of RJ Meyer and Associates, CPA’s discussed the 2007-08 audit of municipal funds.
- All funds reconciled and no fraud was found
- Some debt has been retired early with substantial interest savings
- Assets exceed liabilities
- All funds are within budget
- Utility funds are close to self supporting
- Area banks are stable but we need to be vigilant in keeping sufficient securities and accounts allocated.
Kennedy moved,
Discussion was had on
the proposed ordinance prohibiting large dumpsters on City property, specifically
streets and right-of-ways. Kennedy
moved,
Whiting moved,
Strauser seconded, approving Change Order #3 for a 30-day extension on the
Avenue I sewer project. Roll call vote:
Yea –
___________________________________ _________________________________